بررسی کارایی علف‌کش کند‌رهاشونده پیرازوسولفورون‌اتیل + پرتیلاکلر در کنترل علف‌های هرز برنج در کشت نشایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رشت، ایران

2 استادیار، معاونت موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، آمل، ایران

3 استادیار، موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رشت، ایران

4 کارشناس، موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رشت، ایران

چکیده

تنوع علف‌های‌ هرز شالیزار، موجب استفاده از مخلوط علف‌کش‌های با مکانیزم عمل متفاوت جهت افزایش کارایی مدیریت شیمیایی شده است. علف‌کش جدید پیرازکلر (Pirazchlor, TB 17%) حاصل اختلاط پیرازوسولفورون‌اتیل از سولفونیل‌اوره‌ها با پرتیلاکلر از کلرواستامید‌ها است که به‌صورت قرص‌های حدود پنج‌ گرمی کند‌رها‌شونده برای کنترل علف‌های ‌هرز برنج در کشت نشایی معرفی شده است. در این پژوهش، کارایی مقادیر 191، 383، 574 و 765 گرم ماده موثره در هکتار (g ai.ha-1) پیرازکلر در مقایسه با علف‌کش‌های رایج پرتیلاکلر (EC 50%, 750 g ai.ha-1)+ بن‌سولفورون‌متیل (بن‌سولفورون، DF 60%, 35 g ai.ha-1)، تیوبنکارب (EC 50%, 2500 g ai.ha-1)+ بن‌سولفورون، تریافامون+ اتوکسی‌سولفورون (کانسیل، WG 30%, 30 g ai.ha-1) به­همراه دو تیمار شاهد (بدون کنترل و وجین‌دستی) بر کنترل علف‌های هرز و عملکرد برنج رقم هاشمی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزارع پژوهشی موسسه تحقیقات برنج کشور در گیلان و مازندران در سال 1397 انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که کنترل علف‌های ‌هرز و عملکرد برنج تحت تأثیر تیمار، مکان و برهمکنش تیمار در مکان قرار گرفت. در مازندران، زیست‌توده و تراکم علف‌های ‌هرز در حدود یک‌دهم گیلان و کارایی تمام علف‌کش‌ها مساوی یا بیش­تر از 95 درصد بود. در گیلان، کارایی علف‌کش‌ها در کاهش تراکم سوروف (که بیش­تر یا مساوی 88 درصد بود)، بیش از پیزور (با 51 تا 97 درصد) بود. کارایی پیرازکلر در دزهای 383 گرم و بیش از آن، مشابه یا بهتر از علف‌کش‌های رایج بود. خسارت اقتصادی علف هرز در تیمار شاهد بدون کنترل در مازندران و گیلان به‌ترتیب 25 و 78 درصد نسبت به تیمار شاهد وجین‌دستی برآورد شد. بیش­ترین عملکرد شلتوک در گیلان 4450 و مازندران 5001 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود که به‌ترتیب از دزهای 765 و 363 گرم پیرازکلر به‌دست آمد و مشابه یا بیش­تر از تیمارهای علف‌کش رایج و در حدود 10 درصد بیش­تر از تیمار شاهد وجین دستی بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the efficacy of new slow released herbicide pyrazosulfuron-ethyl + pretilachlor in weed control in transplanted rice

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bijan Yaghoubi 1
  • Hoda Abadian 2
  • Farzin Pouramir 3
  • Fatemeh Mansourpour 4
1 Assoc. Prof., Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran
2 Assist. Prof., Deputy of Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Amol, Iran
3 Assist. Prof., Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran
4 B. Sc., Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The diversity of paddy weeds has led to the use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action to increase the efficacy of chemical management. The new herbicide pirazchlor (tablet 17%) is a pre-mixture of pyrazo-sulfuron-ethyl from sulfonyl-ureas with pretilachlor from chloro-acetamides which has been introduced in the form of slow released 5 g tablets to control weeds in transplanted rice. In this study, the efficacy of 191, 383, 574 and 765 g ai.ha-1 (g active ingredient per ha) pirazchlor in comparison with the common herbicides, pretilachlor (EC 50%, 750 g ai.ha-1) + bensulfuron methyl (bensulfuron, DF 60%, 35 g ai.ha-1), thiobencarb (EC 50%, 2500 g ai.ha-1) + bensulfuron, triafamone + ethoxysulfuron (council, WG 30%, 30 g ai.ha-1), along with two check treatments (without control and hand weeded control) were investigated on weed control and rice yield. The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design with three replications in research fields of Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII) in Guilan and Mazandaran provinces, Iran, in 2018. The results showed that weeds control and rice yield were affected by treatment, location and treatment × location interaction. In Mazandaran, biomass and density of weeds was about one-tenth of Guilan and the efficacy of all herbicides was ≥95%. In Guilan, the efficacy of herbicides in reducing the density of Echinochloa crus galli (≥88%) was higher than that of Bolboschoenus planiculmis (51-97%). The efficacy of pirazchlor at doses of 383 g ai.ha-1 or above was similar to or better than the common herbicides. Grain yield loss (economic damage of weeds) in the check treatment of without weed control in Mazandaran and Guilan was 25% and 78%, respectively, compared to hand weeded control. The highest paddy yield in Guilan and Mazandaran was 4450 and 5001 kg.ha-1, which were obtained in doses of 765 and 363 (g ai.ha-1), respectively, and were similar to or more than the common herbicide treatments and about 10% more than the hand weeded control.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broadleaf
  • Combined herbicides
  • Grass
  • Sedge
  • Weed density
Bhat, M. A., Hussain, A., Ganai, M. A., Jehangir, I. A. and Teli, N. A. 2017. Bioefficacy of pyrazosulfuron and bensulfuron methyl in combination with pretilachlor against weeds in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under temperate conditions of Kashmir. Journal of Crop and Weed 3: 178-182.##Chauhan, B. S., Ngoc, S. T. T., Duong, D. and Le Ngoc, P. 2014. Effect of pretilachlor on weedy rice and other weeds in wet-seeded rice cultivation in South Vietnam. Plant Production Science 17: 315-320.##Halloway, K. l., Kookana, R. S., Noy, D. M., Smith, J. G. and Wilhelm, N. 2006. Crop damage caused by residual Acetolactate synthase herbicides in the soils of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46: 1323-1331.##Hashemi Gourab, S. N., Yaghoubi, B., Vahedi, A. and Musaviyan Koohsare, M. 2013. Evaluating the effect of mixing herbicides on their efficacy in paddy fields. Proceedings of the 5th Iranian Weed Science Congress. August 24, Karaj, Iran. pp: 1052-1055. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Hill, J. E., Roberts, S. R., Bayer, D. E. and Williams, J. F. 1990. Crop Response and weed control from new herbicide combinations in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology 4 (4): 838-842.##Hyzak, D. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1974. Rate of degradation of metribuzin and two analogs in soil. Weed Science 22 (1): 75-79.##Im, I. B. and Ryhang, C. H. 1997. Occurrence ecology and control of barnyardgrass to cropping patterns. Annual Experiment Research Report. National Honam Agricultural Experiment Station, Iksan, Korea. pp: 497-508. (In Korean).##Jordan, D. L. and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with post-emergence applications of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology 12: 537-541.##Kaushik, S., Streibig, J. C. and Cedergreen, N. 2006. Activities of mixtures of soil-applied herbicides with different molecular targets. Pest Management Science 62:1092-1097.##Kazemini, A. and Ghadiri, H. 2004. Interaction effect of plant spacing and nitrogen on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under different barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) densities. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 25 (2): 202-213. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Maazi Kajal, V., Yaghoubi, B., Farahpour, A., Mehrpouyan, M. and Vahedi, A. 2012. Comparison of the efficacy of penoxsulam with some common paddy rice herbicides. Cereal Research 2 (3): 223-235. (In Persian with English Abstract).##McKnight, B. M., Webster, E. P. and Blouin, D. C. 2018. Benzobicyclon activity on common Louisiana rice weeds. Weed Technology 3: 314-318.##Mallory-Smith, C. A. and Retzinger, E. J. 2003. Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technology 17: 605-619.##Matsunaka, S. 2001. Historical review of rice herbicides in Japan. Weed Biology and Managemet 1: 10-14.##Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C. and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Weed science, principle and practices. Fourth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, INC. 685 p.##Moyer, J. R. and Hamman, W. M. 2001. Factors affecting the toxicity of MON 37500 residues to following crops. Weed Technology 15 (1): 42-47.##Naylor, R. L. 1996. Herbicides in Asian rice: Transitions in weed management. IRRI. 270 p.##Naylor, R. E. L. 2002.Weed management handbook. British Crop Protection Enterprises. 432 p.##Ni, H., Moody, K. and Robles, R. P. 2004. Analysis of competition between wet seeded rice and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) using a response-surface model. Weed Science 52 (1): 142-146.##Okafor, L. I. and De Datta, S. K. 1976. Competition between upland rice and purple nutsedge for nitrogen, moisture and light. Weed Science24 (1): 43-46.##Ottis, B. V. and Talbert, R. E. 2007. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and rice density effects on rice yield components. Weed Technology 21: 110-118.##Pal, S., Banerjee, H. and Mandal, N. N. 2009. Efficacy of low dose of herbicides against weeds in transplanted kharif rice (Oryza sativa L.). The Journal of Plant Protection Sciences 1 (1): 31-33.##Pal, S., Ghosh, R., Banerjee, H., Kundu, R. and Alipatra, A. 2012. Effect of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on yield of transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science 44 (4): 210-213.##Petersen, B. B. and Shea, P. J. 1989. Miroencapsulated alachlor and its behavior on wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw. Weed Science 37: 719-723.##Pouramir, F., Yaghoubi, B. and Aminpanah, H. 2020. Efficacy of new herbicides triafamone + ethoxysulfuron, flucetosulfuron and pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on paddy fields weed control. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 50 (4): 127-136. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Rajabian, M., Asghari, J., Ehteshami, S. M. R. and Yaghoubi, B. 2017. Response of landrace and improved genotypes of rice to weed competition in direct-seeded system. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 13 (1): 79-96. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Sandral, G. A., Dear, B. S., Pratley, J. E. and Cullis, B. R. 1997. Herbicide dose rate response curve in subterranean clover determined by a bioassay.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37: 67-74.##Shibayama, H. 2001. Weeds and weed management in rice production in Japan. Weed Biology and Management 1 (1): 53-60.##Shinn, S. L., Thill, D. C. and Price, W. J. 1999. Volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with MON 37500. Weed Technology 13: 88-93.##Smith, R. J. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technology 2: 232-241.##Suzuki, K., Shirai, Y. and Hirata, H. 1990. Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, a new sulfonylurea herbicide for paddy rice. In: Grayson, B.T., Green, M. B. and Copping, L. G. (Eds.). Pest management in rice. Springer, Dordrecht. pp: 338-348.##Takeshita, T. and Noritake, K. 2001. Development and promotion of laborsaving application technology for paddy herbicides in Japan. Weed Biology and Management 1: 61-70.##Yaghoubi, B. 2015. Chemical control of pondweed (Potamogeton nodosus) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in paddy fields. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 11 (2): 195-207. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Yaghoubi, B. 2017. Study the efficacy of new herbicide Council WG 300 in paddy field weed control.Final report of the project. Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran. 48 p. (In Persian).##Yaghoubi, B. 2020. Study the efficacy of Cheaf herbicide on weed control in rice ratooning.Final report of the project. Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran. 26 p. (In Persian).##Yaghoubi, B., Alizadeh, H., Rahimian, H., Baghestani, M., Sharifi, M. and Davatgar, N. 2010. A review on researches conducted on paddy field weeds and herbicides in Iran. Proceedings of the 3rd Iranian Weed Science Congress. February 17, Babolsar, Mazandaran, Iran. pp: 2-11. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Yamada, T. 1980. Rice plant dwarfing by thiobencarb’s metabolite. Kagaku to Seibutu 18: 605-606. (In Japanese with English Abstract).##