Evaluation of genetic diversity of maize lines (Zea mays L.) based on agro-morphological traits using factor analysis under zinc deficiency conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of plant production and genetic engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Higher Education Complex of Saravan. Saravan, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The first step in breeding programs is to use the genetic diversity among existing populations, cultivars and lines. Maize is used as a model plant to study the genetics of various traits. Compared to other crops, maize has a high demand for zinc (Zn) and is known as an indicator of zinc deficiency in the soil. In terms of climatic conditions, Iran is located in a arid and semi-arid region, and there is a lack of micronutrients specially Zn in this region. Lack of nutrients such as Zn is one of the important abiotic stresses that affects the growth and development of plants including maize. The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic diversity of a number of corn lines under normal and zinc deficiency conditions.
Materials and methods
To assess the genetic diversity of 95 maize lines using agro-morphological traits, an experiment was carried out in alpha lattice design in two replications under two normal (use of zinc sulfate fertilizer) and zinc deficiency (no use of zinc sulfate fertilizer) conditions in Zabol Agricultural Research Center during two years. The studied maize lines were obtained from Razi University of Kermanshah, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, and Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII) in the form of research project No. 94/101/T.T. approved by Biotechnology Institute of Urmia University. Twenty-nine traits were measured and recorded. Combined analysis of variance of the studied traits under normal and zinc (Zn) deficiency conditions were performed using SAS ver. 9.4 software. Other statistical analyzes including descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, forward stepwise regression and factor analysis method were done using R software by pastecs, corrplot, olsrr, and psych packages, respectively.
Research findings
The results of this study revealed high phenotypic variation among the studied maize lines for all investigated traits under both normal and zinc (Zn) deficiency stress conditions. The results of analysis of variance confirmed the presence of high phenotypic diversity among maize lines. All traits were affected by environment, and a statistically significant difference was observed between two environments for the all measured traits in maize lines. Genotype × environment interaction was also significant for most of the studied traits. Descriptive statistics showed a considerable diversity among the lines, and the highest diversity in both normal and zinc deficiency conditions was observed for yield per unit area, economic yield, and number of grains per cob. In correlation analysis, weight of five cobs, number of grains per cob, and 100-grain weight showed a positive and significant correlation with economic yield in both normal and zinc deficiency conditions. Therefore, these three can be introduced as important traits in the initial selection of zinc deficiency tolerant lines. In factor analysis of morphological traits using the parallel analysis method, four hidden and independent factors were determined under both normal and zinc deficiency conditions, which explained 63% and 57% of the total variation of the lines, respectively. Based on the results of the factor analysis, the traits number of days to tasseling, number of days to pollen emergence, number of days to cob emergence, plant height, ear diameter and width, number of grains per cob, economic yield, yield per unit area, and harvest index with high degree of commonality under both normal and zinc deficiency conditions, can be suggested as key traits for the selection of zinc deficiency tolerant lines.
Conclusion
The results of this research showed that there is a high genetic diversity among the studied maize lines in terms of morphological traits under both normal and zinc deficiency stress conditions. It makes it possible to use these lines in breeding programs as a valuable genic source to improve the performance of lines and produce improved lines under normal and zinc deficiency conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmad Hisham, A.R., Ch’ng, H.Y., Rahman, M.M., Mat, K. and Zulhisyam, A.K. 2021. Effects of zinc on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated in a tropical acid soil using different application techniques. Earth and Environmental Science, 756, 01205. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/756/1/012056.
Arzhangh, S., Darvishzadeh, R. and Alipour, H. 2021. Evaluation of genetic diversity of maize lines (Zea mays L.) under normal and salinity stress conditions. Cereal Research, 11(3), pp. 268-243. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22124/CR.2022.21075.1699.
Aziz, M.A., Ahmad, H.R., Corwin, D.L., Sabir, M., Hakeem, K.R. and Ozturk, M. 2017. Influence of farmyard manure on retention and availability of nickel, zinc and lead in metal-contaminated calcareous loam soils. Journal of Enviromental Engineering and Landscap Management, 25(3), pp. 289–296. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2016.1254639.
Bukvic, V. and Bartlett, W. 2003. Financial barriers to SME growth in Slovenia. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 5(3), pp. 161-181.
Cakmak, I. and Kutman, U.B. 2018. Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: A review. EuropeanJournal of Soil Science, 69(1), pp. 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12437.
Cooper, J. C. B. 1983. Factor analysis. An overview. The Amerian Statistician, 37(2), pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685875.
Falconer, D.S. and  Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow.
Genc, Y., Verbyla, A.P., Torun, A., Cakmak, I., Willsmore, K., Wallwork, H. and McDonald, G.K. 2009. Quantitative trait loci analysis of zinc efficiency and grain zinc concentration in wheat using whole genome average interval mapping. Journal of Plant and Soil, 314, pp. 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9704-3.
Harada, K., Huan, N.V. and Ueno, H. 2009. Classification of maize landraces from Shikoku and Kyushu, Japan, based on phenotypic characteristics. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 43(3), pp. 213-220. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.43.213.
Hanway, J.J. 1986. How a corn plant develops. Special Report 48. Iowa State University of Science and Technology. Cooperation and Extension Service, Ames, Iowa.
Hong, W. and Ji-Yun, Jin. 2007. Effects of zinc deficiency and drought on plant growth and metabolism of reactive oxygen species in maize (Zea mays L). Agricultural Sciences in China, 6(8), pp. 988-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(07)60138-2.
Hodge, A. 2006. Plastic plants and patchy soils. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(2), pp. 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri280.
Khodarahmpour, Z. 2012. Morphological classification of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in heat stress condition. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(5), pp. 31-40. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n5p31.
Lautenschlager, G.J. 1989. A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analysis for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research,  24(3), pp. 365-395. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6.
Malakouti, M.J. 2003. The role of zink in plant growth and enhancing animal and human health. Regional Expert Consultion on Plant, Animal and Human Nutrition. Interaction and Impact. Damascus, Syria Damascus, Syria.
Mohammadi, S.A. and Prasanna, B.M. 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science, 43(4), pp. 1235-1248. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235.
Montoya, M., Guardia, G., Recio, J., Castellano-Hinojosa, A., Ginés, C., Bedmar, E.J., Alvarez, J.M. and Vallejo, A. 2021. Zinc-nitrogen co-fertilization influences N2O emissions and microbial communities in an irrigated maize field. Geoderma, 383, 114735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114735.
Nikolić, D., Rakonjac, V., Milatović, D. and Fotirić, M. 2010. Multivariate analysis of vineyard peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] germplasm collection. Euphytica, 171(2), pp. 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0032-3.
Peaslee, D.E. and Phillips, R.E. 1981. Phosphorus dissolution‐desorption in relation to bioavailability and environmental pollution. Chemistry in the Soil Environment, 40, pp. 241-259. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub40.c13.
Reddy, M.P., Sarla, N. and  Siddiq, E.A. 2002. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica, 128(1), pp. 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020691618797.
Rehman, R., Asif, M., Cakmak, I. and Ozturk, L. 2021. Differences in uptake and translocation of foliar-applied Zn in maize and wheat. Plant and Soil, 462(12), pp. 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04867-3.
Revelle., W. 2016. R package ‘psych’. Ver. 1.6.4. Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Sadeghi, F. and  Rahimi, M. 2017.  The use of cluster analysis for best lines selection in maize at S6 generation. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20), pp. 91-98. [In Persian].
Shemi, R., Wang, R., Gheith, E. M.S., Hussain, H.A., Hussain, S., Irfan, M., Cholidah, L., Zhang, K. and Zhang, S. 2021. Effects of salicylic acid, zinc and glycine betaine on morphophysiological growth and yield of maize under drought stress. Scientific Reports, 11(1), pp. 3195-3210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82264-7.
Suganya, A., Saravanan, A., Baskar, M., Pandiyarajan, P. and Kavimani, R. 2021. Agronomic biofortification of maize (Zea mays L.) with zinc by using of graded levels of zinc in combination with zinc solubilizing bacteria and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(7), pp. 988-994. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1845383.
Welsh, J.R. 1981. Fundamentals of plant genetics and breeding. John Wiley and Sons، Inc
Wei, T. and Simko, V. 2021. R package ‘corrplot’. Ver. 0.92. Visualization of a correlation matrix.
Yu, B.G., Chen, X.X., Cao, W.Q., Liu, Y.M. and Zou, C.Q. 2020. Responses in zinc uptake of different mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal crops to varied levels of phosphorus and zinc applications. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 606472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.606472.
Zhang, L., Yan, M., Ren, Y., Chen, Y. and  Zhang, S. 2021. Zinc regulates the hydraulic response of maize root under water stress conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 159, pp. 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.12.014.