Investigating the genetic diversity of bread wheat germplasm under drought stress

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Research Assistant Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Researcher, Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Yazd, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Wheat ranks second among cereals in term of global production, but it has been affected by ongoing global climate changes. Drought stress is one of the important factors contributing to the reduction in wheat production. Developing drought-tolerant wheat varieties currently presents a major challenge for wheat breeders. Complex multigenic and multitrait genetic control, high genotype-environment interaction, low heritability, and challenges associated with high-throughput screening of plant traits and genes effective in drought tolerance due to the involvement of numerous traits and positive and negative correlations among them are some of the factors that have made wheat variety improvement for drought tolerance a challenging task. Selecting drought-tolerant genotypes as a cost-effective and biologically superior approach to increasing wheat production in low humidity areas has always been considered by breeders. Screening wheat genotypes to identify drought tolerance sources is essential and can be useful in selecting appropriate and desirable parents for implementing beneficial breeding programs. Local plant populations such as landraces are valuable resources for environmental stress tolerance, including drought stress. Local plant varieties are heterogeneous populations with local adaptation that provide genetic resources capable of meeting the needs imposed by new and emerging agricultural challenges under highly stressful conditions. The aim of this study was to identify wheat accessions tolerant to drought stress for use in future breeding programs.
Materials and methods
A total of 512 wheat accessions from the National Plant Gene Bank of Iran, along with the varieties Kavir, Roshan and Mahouti as controls, were evaluated for drought stress tolerance in the research field of Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Yazd, Iran. The experiment was conducted in two separate augmented designs, one of which was considered to drought stress and the other to normal irrigation conditions. Drought stress was induced by limiting the irrigation cycle. Considering that out of the total studied genetic materials, 141 accessions survived, the evaluation of traits was perfoemed on both those surviving accessions and their corresponding counterparts in the normal experiment. For data analysis, descriptive statistics including minimum, maximum, average, and coefficient of variation were calculated. Correlation coefficients were estimated and tested to study the relationship between traits. Stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the role of each trait and to identify the important and influencing traits on five-spike grain weight. K-means cluster analysis method was used to separate the accessions. All statistical analyzes were performed using R and SPSS softwares.
Research findings
The results of descriptive statistics showed that the highest coefficient of variation under normal and drought stress conditions were attributed to five-spike grain weight (23.35%) and number of fertile tillers per plant (31.67%), respectively. Five-spike grain weight had the highest decrease in range (51.3%) under drought stress compared to normal conditions, and the highest decrease in mean was observed for number of fertile tillers per plant (59.3%) and five-spike grain weight (40.5%), respectively. A large number of accessions showed superiority over control varieties under both normal and drought stress conditions, so that 97 accessions had five-spike grain weight more than the control varieties. The accessions KC12856, KC12776, KC12783, KC12767, and KC12697 with values of 6.77, 6.75, 6.22, 5.94 and 5.86 g, respectively, had the highest five-spike grain weight under drought stress conditions. Number of spikelets per spike, number of florets per spikelet, 100-grain weight and number of grains per spike had significant and strong correlation coefficients at 1% probability level with five-spike grain weight under drought stress conditions. Based on the results of stepwise regression analysis under drought stress conditions, three traits including number of grains per spike, 100-grain weight and spike length were the most effective traits on five-spike grain weight and explained 90.6% of it’s variation. The studied genetic materials were grouped into five separated clusters using K-means cluster analysis.
Conclusion
The results of this experiment showed the valuable potential of the studied germplasm to drought stress tolerance. Evaluating the relationships among traits revealed the significance of number of grains per spikelet, number of spikelets per spike, number of florets per spikelet, and 100-grain weight under both normal and drought stress conditions. A considerable number of accessions were superior to the control varieties under both normal and drought stress conditions, indicating the richness and valuable potential of these genetic resources for drought tolerance related traits. Therefore, it is recommended to continue screening and evaluating the wheat collection of National Plant Gene Bank of Iran to identify drought stress-tolerant genetic resources. Based on the results of cluster analysis, the control cultivars with different characteristics were grouped in the separate clusters, and a distinguished cluster of the studied wheat accessions with superior traits was also formed. The diverse germplasm or superior accessions identified in this study can be used to develope the genetic base in crosses or as parents in breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abhinandan, K., Skori, L., Stanic, M., Hickerson, N.M., Jamshed, M. and Samuel, M.A. 2018. Abiotic stress signaling in wheat–an inclusive overview of hormonal interactions during abiotic stress responses in wheat. Frontiers in plant science 9, 734. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00734.
Ahmad, A., Aslam, Z., Javed, T., Hussain, S., Raza, A., Shabbir, R., Mora-Poblete, F., Saeed, T., Zulfiqar, F., Ali, M.M., Nawaz, M., Rafiq, M., Osman, H.S.,  Albaqami, M.,  Ahmed, M.A.A. and Tauseef,  M. 2022. Screening of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance through agronomic and physiological response. Agronomy, 12(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020287.
Arshad, Y. and Zahravi, M. 2012. Identification of drought tolerant genotypes in selected wheat genetic resources in the National Plant Gene-Bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 13(1), pp. 157-177. [In Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1390.13.1.12.6.
Arshad, Y., Zahravi, M. and Soltani, A. 2013. Identification of genetic resources tolerant to drought stress in bread wheat germplasm. Journal of crop production Research, 5(3), pp. 227-235. [In Persian].
Bahraini Vijuyeh, V., Dadashi, M.R. and Nazeri, S.M. 2019. Assessment of tolerance to drought stress at reproductive phase in some wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) using drought tolerance and Susceptibility Indices. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 17(1), pp. 111-121. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V1711.69690.
Barati, V., Bijanzadeh, E. and Naderi, R. 2019. Determination the most suitable effective traits on grain yield of bread wheat genotypes under normal and drought conditions in Darab region, Fars Province. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 11(39), pp. 138-152. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20085958.1398.11.39.12.8.
Barati, V., Bijanzadeh, E., Behpouri, A. and Zinati, Z. 2019. Response of various bread wheat genotypes to different planting method and terminal drought stress at southern Fars province. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 10(35), pp. 244-255. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20085958.1397.10.35.22.3.
Basu, S., Ramegowda, V., Kumar, A. and Pereira, A. 2016. Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Research, 5(F1000 Faculty Rev), 1554. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7678.1.
Borrás, L., Slafer, G.A. and Otegui, M.E. 2004. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research, 86(2-3), pp. 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.002.
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A.M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A. and Stanca, A.M. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research, 105(1-2), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004.
Chowdhury, M.K., Hasan, M.A., Bahadur, M.M., Islam, M.R., Hakim, M.A., Iqbal, M.A., Javed, T., Raza, A., Shabbir, R., Sorour, S. and Elsanafawy, N.E. 2021. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes through phenology, growth, and physiological indices. Agronomy, 11(9), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091792.
Daei Alhag, D., Rashidi, V., Aharizad, S., Farahvash, F. and Mirshekari, B. 2020. Classification of advanced spring wheat genotypes under non-stress and drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(34), pp. 115-129. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.12.34.115.
Dwivedi, S.L., Ceccarelli, S., Blair, M.W., Upadhyaya, H.D., Are, A.K. and Ortiz, R. 2016. Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends in Plant Science, 21(1), pp. 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.012.
Eftekhari, A., Baghizadeh, A., Abdoshahi, R. and Yaghoubi, M.M. 2020. Evaluation of grain yield, agronomical traits and drought tolerance indices in some bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11(32), pp. 11-21. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.11.32.11.
Fahad, S., Bajwa, A.A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S.A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S. and Ihsan, M.Z. 2017. Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147.
FAO. 2018. Crop Prospects and Food Situation. Quarterly Global Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3672en.
Farshadfar, E. and Amiri, R. 2018. Investigating drought resistance of different bread wheat lines using agrophysiological traits and integrated selection criterion. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 11(1), pp. 79-91. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2017.189.1046.
Fleury, D., Jefferies, S., Kuchel, H. and Langridge, P. 2010. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(12), pp. 3211-3222. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq152.
Hassani, F., Houshmand, S., Rafiei, F.  and Niazi, A. 2018. Evaluation of wheat cultivars and lines for terminal drought tolerance using drought tolerance and susceptibility indices. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 9(33), pp. 55-67. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20085958.1397.10.33.6.3.
Hu, H. and Xiong, L. 2014. Genetic engineering and breeding of drought-resistant crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, pp. 715-741. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040000.
IBPGR. 1978. Descriptors for wheat and Aegilops. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy.
Khalili, M. and Naghavi, M.R. 2018. Evaluation of genetic diversity of spring wheat cultivars for physiological and agronomic traits under drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10(25), pp. 138-151. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.10.25.138.
Khosravi, S., Azizinezhad, R., Baghizadeh, A. and Maleki, M. 2019. Evaluation of tolerance for drought among a number of wild diploid populations, tetraploid and hexaploid cultivars of wheat using morphological and agronomic traits. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11(31), pp. 11-27. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.11.31.11.
Lipiec, J., Doussan, C., Nosalewicz, A. and Kondracka, K. 2013. Effect of drought and heat stresses on plant growth and yield: A review. International Agrophysics, 27(4), pp. 463-477. https://doi.org/10.2478/intag-2013-0017.
Mitra, J. 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science, 80(6), pp. 758-763.
Mwadzingeni, L., Shimelis, H., Dube, E., Laing, M.D. and Tsilo, T.J. 2016. Breeding wheat for drought tolerance: Progress and technologies. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(5), pp. 935-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61102-9.
Naderi, F., Bavandpori, F., Farshadfar, E. and Farshadfar, M. 2020. Screening and identification of drought tolerant bread wheat landraces (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 14(2), pp. 275-292. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.30495/JCEP.2022.676143.
Nasiri Khalilelahi, S., Sasani, S., Ahmadi, G. and Daneshvar, M. 2020. Effect of terminal drought stress on some agronomic traits of 20 elite bread wheat genotypes. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 13(3), pp. 683-699. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2020.2226.1564.
Newton, A.C., Akar, T., Baresel, J.P., Bebeli, P.J., Bettencourt, E., Bladenopoulos, K.V., Czembor, J.H., Fasoula, D.A., Katsiotis, A., Koutis, K. and Koutsika-Sotiriou, M. 2011. Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. Sustainable Agriculture , 2, pp. 147-186. http://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009032.hal-00886526.
OECD/FAO. 2018. OECD FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018 - 2027. Chapter 3: Cereals. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://doi.org/10.1787/agr-outl-data-en.
Okechukwu, E.C., Agbo, C.U., Uguru, M.I. and Ogbonnaya, F.C. 2016. Germplasm evaluation of heat tolerance in bread wheat in Tel Hadya, Syria. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 76(1), pp. 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392016000100002.
Rahimi, Y., Bihamta, M.R., Taleei, A. and Alipour, H. 2019. Genetic variability assessment of Iranian wheat landraces in term of some agronomic attributes under normal irrigation and rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 50(3), pp. 1-16. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2018.258294.654471.
Sadras, V.O. and Angus, J.F. 2006. Benchmarking water-use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57(8), pp. 847-856. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05359.
Shahryari, R. 2016. Evaluation of genetic variation of bread wheat genotypes for some morphological and physiological characteristics under drought stress condition. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10(38), pp. 413-430. [In Persian].
Shanazari, M., Golkar, P., Mirmohammady Maibody, S.A.M. and Shahsavand-Hassani, H. 2021. Using drought tolerance indices in evaluation of some wheat, triticale and tritipyrum genotypes. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 10(4), pp. 45-68. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.47176/jcpp.10.4.35721.
Sheibanirad, A., Farshadfar, E. and Najafi, A. 2018. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in some bread wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 9(31), pp. 1-14. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/20.1001.1.20085958.1396.9.31.1.7.
Shiferaw, B., Smale, M., Braun, H.J., Duveiller, E., Reynolds, M. and Muricho, G. 2013. Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Security, 5, pp. 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0263-y.
Slafer, G.A. and Andrade, F.H. 1993. Physiological attributes related to the generation of grain yield in bread wheat cultivars released at different eras. Field Crops Research, 31(3-4), pp. 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90073-V.
Tadesse, W., Manes, Y., Singh, R.P., Payne, T. and Braun, H.J. 2010. Adaptation and performance of CIMMYT spring wheat genotypes targeted to high rainfall areas of the world. Crop Science, 50(6), pp. 2240-2248. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.02.0102.
Tahmasebpour, B., Jahanbakhsh, S., Tarinejad, A.R. and Mohammadi, H. 2019. Identification of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought stress tolerant. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 12(3), pp. 663-672. [In Persian]. http://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2019.1508.1337.