Modeling the factors affecting the use of organic fertilizers by paddy farmers in rice cultivation (A case study: Dezful county)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate M.Sc., Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran (* Corresponding author: savari@asnrukh.ac.ir)

3 Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Rice is one of the most important food sources for people in the world, so that more than 50% of the world’s population uses rice as a food source. The excessive use of energy, water, soil and chemical fertilizers by rice farmers has created many challenges for the environment. Most of the existing environmental challenges are rooted in the lack of necessary awareness and self-efficiency in the field of human-nature relationship. In recent years, much attention has been paid to environmental protection behaviors as one of the main factors affecting environmental protection. To change people's behavior, the prerequisites for changing behavior must be identified. Therefore, psychological theories can be widely used. The objective of this research was to model the socio-psychological factors affecting the use of organic fertilizers by paddy farmers.
Materials and methods
This study is a quantitative research in term of nature, applied and practical in purpose, and descriptive correlation in data collection. The statistical population of this research included 4700 paddy farmers in Dezful country, Khuzestan province, Iran, in 2021. Sampling was performed by cluster method and the sample size was estimated to be 360 samples based on the Karjesi and Morgan table. The studied population is divided into four sections, Shahiun, Sardasht, Markazi, and Chaghamish, which Sardasht and Shahyoun sections were excluded due to their mountainous nature and the absence of paddy farmers, and sampling with tha same proportion was done only from the two sections, Markazi and Chaghamish. The main research tool was a researcher-made and pre-tested questionnaire. The formal and content validity of the questionnaire was based on expert’s opinions and the reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and composite reliability tests. The alpha value and the composite reliability for all sections was higher than 0.7 and 0.6, respectively. SPSS version 26 and Smart Pls software were used to analyze the data in two descriptive and inferential sections. For data analysis, frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used for the descriptive statistics section, and structural equation modeling was used for the inferential statistics section.
Research findings
In this research, the theory of planned behavior was used as the theoretical framework of the research. The results are presented in two parts, measurement and structural model. The results from the measurement model showed that the measurement items were confirmed in terms of one-dimensionality of indicators, validity and reliability, and diagnostic validity. In the structural model section, after evaluating the fitted indices, the research hypotheses were tested. To evaluate the significance of the path coefficients (beta statistic), bootstrapping resumption method in two modes of 100 and 300 samples was used. The results showed that there was no change in the significance levels of the parameters in two cases. In the other words, the results were highly validity, because the significance of the relationships between the variables was not affected by the sample size, and only the value of the t-Student statistic changed. Therefore, it is possible to test the research hypotheses in the form of regression model. The results indicated that all research hypotheses are confirmed based on the predicted relationships. The results also showed that the research variables explained 60.5% of the application of organic fertilizers in rice cultivation among the studied paddy farmers.
Conclusion
The results of the current study showed that only economic factors should not be considered as variables predicting behavior, and social and psychological variables may also have a greater contribution. The results indicated that the theory used in this field was very efficient, and its variables including attitude, mental norms, perceived behavior control and willingness to use organic fertilizer in rice cultivation could explain more than 60% of the variance of paddy farmer’s behavior in this field. Explain the context. In total, since perceived behavior control was more important than other research variables, it is suggested to increase the self-efficiency level of paddy farmers in this field by holding workshops and training courses.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ababneh, K. I., Ahmed, K., & Dedousis, E. (2022). Predictors of cheating in online exams among business students during the covid pandemic: Testing the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100713. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100713.##Abbasian, A., & Aminpanah, H. (2018). Effects of previous crop and rate of phosphorous fertilizer application on yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. Shiroudi. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology11(4), 889-904. [In Persian].##Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., & Anwar, A. (2020). Transition pathways for Malaysian paddy farmers to sustainable agricultural practices: An integrated exhibiting tactics to adopt green fertilizer. Land Use Policy, 90, 104255. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104255.##Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.##Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Education.##Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1080/14792779943000116.##Amini, A., Nouri, S. A., & Sangdeh, B. A. (2015). Evaluation of rice production sustainability using multi criteria decision making methods: The case of Rezvanshahr county. Iranian Agricultural Extension & Education Journal, 11(1), 101-126. [In Persian]. dorl: 20.1001.1.20081758.1394.11.1.8.2.##Anh, H. Q., Le, T. P. Q., Le, N. D., Lu, X. X., Duong, T. T., Garnier, J., Rochelle-Newall, E., Zhang, S., Oh, N.-H., Oeurng, C., Ekkawatpanit, C., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T. N., Tran, T. L., Kunisue, T., Tanoue, R., Takahashi, S., Minh, T. B., Le, H. T., Pham, T. N. M., & Nguyen, T. A. H. (2021). Antibiotics in surface water of East and Southeast Asian countries: A focused review on contamination status, pollution sources, potential risks, and future perspectives. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142865.##Anik, A. R., Rahman, S., & Sarker, J. R. (2020). Five decades of productivity and efficiency changes in world agriculture (1969-2013). Agriculture10(6), 200. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10060200.##Bakhtiyari, Z., Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M., & Kazemi, N. (2017). Intention of agricultural professionals toward biofuels in Iran: Implications for energy security, society, and policy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.165.## Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285-301. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H.## Cao, H., Li, F., Zhao, K., Qian, C., & Xiang, T. (2022). From value perception to behavioural intention: Study of Chinese smallholders’ pro-environmental agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management315, 115179. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115179.##Carrijo, D. R., Lundy, M. E., & Linquist, B. A. (2017). Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 203, 173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002.##Chen, Y., Fu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). Effect of farmland scale on farmers’ application behavior with organic fertilizer. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health19(9), 4967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094967.##Damalas, C. A., & Koutroubas, S. D. (2018). Farmers' behaviour in pesticide use: A key concept for improving environmental safety. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 4, 27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.07.001.##de Miranda, M. S., Fonseca, M. L., Lima, A., de Moraes, T. F., & Rodrigues, F. A. (2015). Environmental impacts of rice cultivation. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6(12), 2009. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.612201.##Duan, W., Peng, L., Zhang, H., Han, L., & Li, Y. (2021). Microbial biofertilizers increase fruit aroma content of Fragaria×Ananassa by improving photosynthetic efficiency. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(6), 5323-5330. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.014.##Eldredge, L. K. B., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A., Fernández, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. John Wiley & Sons.##Empidi, A. V. A., & Emang, D. (2021). Understanding public intentions to participate in protection initiatives for forested watershed areas using the theory of planned behavior: A case study of Cameron highlands in Pahang, Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(8), 4399. doi: 10.3390/su13084399.##Erfani, R., Pirdashti, H., Nouri, M., & Abbasi, R. (2019). Comparison of paddy yield and soil qualitative characteristics among different agricultural systems in three regions of Mazandaran. Applied Field Crops Research32(1), 101-122. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22092/aj.2018.122292.1309.##Ferguson, B. J., Mens, C., Hastwell, A. H., Zhang, M., Su, H., Jones, C. H., Chu, X., & Gresshoff, P. M. (2019). Legume nodulation: the host controls the party. Plant, Cell & Environment, 42(1), 41-51. doi: 10.1111/pce.13348.##Francis, J. J, Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J. M., Foy, R., Kaner, E. F. S., Smith, L., & Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. University of Newcastle.##Goh, E., Ritchie, B., & Wang, J. (2017). Non-compliance in national parks: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour model with pro-environmental values. Tourism Management, 59, 123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.004.##Han, H. (2015). Traveler’s pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164-177. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014.##Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 323-334. doi: 10.1080/01973530701665058.##Holt, J. R., Butler, B. J., Borsuk, M. E., Markowski-Lindsay, M., MacLean, M. G., & Thompson, J. R. (2021). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand family forest owner’s intended responses to invasive forest insects. Society & Natural Resources, 34(8), 1001-1018. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2021.1924330.##Homauini, Z., Abolhasani, L., & Sabouhi, M. (2018). Environmental impact assessment of different varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddy in the Kordkoy. Journal of Agroecology10(2), 580-602. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/JAG.V10I2.63502.##Huang, Y., Luo, X., Tang, L., & Yu, W. (2020). The power of habit: does production experience lead to pesticide overuse?. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 27(20), 25287-25296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08961-4.##Karimi, S., & Saghaleini, A. (2021). Factors influencing ranchers’ intentions to conserve rangelands through an extended theory of planned behavior. Global Ecology & Conservation26, e01513. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01513.##Khan, N., Ray, R. L., Kassem, H. S., Hussain, S., Zhang, S., Khayyam, M., Ihtisham, M., & Asongu, S. A. (2021). Potential role of technology innovation in transformation of sustainable food systems: A review. Agriculture11(10), 984. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11100984.##Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G. and van der Putten, W. H. (2019). Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(2), 154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002.##Lu, H., Zhang, P., Hu, H., Xie, H., Yu, Z., & Chen, S. (2019). Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, 109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621.##Maleksaeidi, H., & Keshavarz, M. (2019). What influences farmers' intentions to conserve on-farm biodiversity? An application of the theory of planned behavior in Fars province, Iran. Global Ecology & Conservation20, e00698. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00698.##Mannan, S., Nordin, S. M., Rafik-Galea, S., & Rizal, A. R. A. (2017). The ironies of new innovation and the sunset industry: Diffusion and adoption. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 316-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.015.##Moya, B., Parker, A., & Sakrabani, R. (2019). Challenges to the use of fertilisers derived from human excreta: The case of vegetable exports from Kenya to Europe and influence of certification systems. Food Policy85, 72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.001.##Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in akerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259-284. doi: 10.1348/014466609X449395.##Othman, Z. (2012). Information and communication technology innovation as a tool for promoting sustainable agriculture: A case study of paddy farming in West Malaysia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Malaya.##Popa, B., Niță, M. D., & Hălălișan, A. F. (2019). Intentions to engage in forest law enforcement in Romania: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy & Economics, 100,
33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.005.##Qin, G., Niu, Z., Yu, J., Li, Z., Ma, J., & Xiang, P. (2021). Soil heavy metal pollution and food safety in China: Effects, sources and removing technology. Chemosphere, 267, 129205. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129205.##Ruepert, A., Keizer, K., Steg, L., Maricchiolo, F., Carrus, G., Dumitru, A.,  Mira, R., Stancu, A., & Moza, D. (2016). Environmental considerations in the organizational context: A pathway to pro-environmental behavior at work. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.004.##Savari, M. (2023). Explaining the rancher’s behavior of rangeland conservation in western Iran. Frontiers in Psychology13, 1090723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1090723.##Savari, M., & Khaleghi, B. (2023). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior in predicting the behavioral intentions of Iranian local communities toward forest conservation. Frontiers in Psychology14, 1121396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121396.##Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H., Eskandari Damaneh, H., & Cotton, M. (2023). Integrating the norm activation model and theory of planned behaviour to investigate farmer pro-environmental behavioural intention. Scientific Reports13(1), 5584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32831-x.##Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: An experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 283. doi: 10.1037/h0029614.##Stern, P. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.##Trihadmojo, B., Jones, C. R., Prasastyoga, B., Walton, C., & Sulaiman, A. (2020). Toward a nuanced and targeted forest and peat fires prevention policy: Insight from psychology. Forest Policy & Economics, 120, 102293. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102293.##Tseng, T. H., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., Lin, S. J., Wang, Y. S., & Tsai, T. H. (2022). Relationships between locus of control, theory of planned behavior, and cyber entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of cyber entrepreneurship education. The International Journal of Management Education20(3), 100682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100682.##Ullah, S., Abid, A., Aslam, W., Noor, R. S., Waqas, M. M., & Gang, T. (2021). Predicting behavioral intention of rural inhabitants toward economic incentive for deforestation in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(2), 617. doi: 10.3390/su13020617.##Wang, Y., Zhou, S., & Jiang, G. (2023). Can the application of environmentally friendly fertilisers reduce agricultural labour input? Empirical evidence from peanut farmers in China. Sustainability15(4), 2989. doi: 10.3390/su15042989.##Wauters, E., Bielders, C., Poesen, J., Govers, G., & Mathijs, E. (2010). Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27(1), 86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009.##Wu, H., & Ge, Y. (2019). Excessive application of fertilizer, agricultural non-point source pollution, and farmer’s policy choice. Sustainability11(4), 1165. doi: 10.3390/su11041165.##Xiang, Z., Tian, Q., & Li, Q. (2021). Perceived risk, environmental attitude and fertilizer application by vegetable farmers in China. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(3), 683-690. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctaa101.##Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumer’s intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732-739. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120.##Yuan, F., Tang, K., & Shi, Q. (2021). Does Internet use reduce chemical fertilizer use? Evidence from rural households in China. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 28, 6005-6017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10944-4.##Zheng, S., Yin, K., & Yu, L. (2022). Factors influencing the farmer's chemical fertilizer reduction behavior from the perspective of farmer differentiation. Heliyon, 8(12), e11918. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11918.