Evaluation of yield, water productivity and drought tolerance of forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cultivars under different irrigation methods and regimes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Research Assistant Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The lack of irrigation water resources in the country in recent years has reduced the yield of crops and threatened food security; Therefore, it is necessary to think of ways to produce crops while saving water. One of the ways to increase production with limited irrigation water resources is the cultivation of drought-tolerant crops with high water use efficiency. Sorghum is known as one of the most important crops in arid and semi-arid regions of the world with its unique characteristics (including tolerance to environmental stresses, especially drought and heat, deep and extensive root system, C4 photosynthetic pathway, etc.). The use of appropriate irrigation methods is also known as another way to increase the production of crops with limited water resources. In this regard, the irrigation methods of alternate furrow irrigation and drip irrigation have been used as new irrigation management solutions in the country with favorable results. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different irrigation regimes and methods on yield, morphological characteristics, water productivity, and drought tolerance of open-pollinated and hybrid forage sorghum cultivars.
Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted as a factorial split-plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran, during the 2019 and 2020 cropping seasons. The factorial combination of four irrigation methods (CFI, conventional furrow irrigation; FFI, fixed alternate furrow irrigation; AFI, variable alternate furrow irrigation; and drip irrigation) and three levels of drought stress (full irrigation, moderate stress, and severe stress; including the supply 100, 75, and 50% of soil moisture deficit, respectively) as the main factor and two sorghum cultivars (Speedfeed and Pegah) as sub-factor were investigated. In this study, traits including silage yield, dry matter yield and percentage, irrigation water use efficiency, benefit per drop, net benefit per drop, leaf-to-stem ratio, plant height, and drought stress tolerance indices were evaluated. Due to the homogeneity of the variances of experimental errors over two years, the data were subjected to combined analysis of variance using SAS 9.1 statistical software, and Tukey's test (P≤0.05) was used to compare the means. In addition, IPASTIC online software was used to calculate stress tolerance indices and principal component analysis (PCA) based on these indices.
Research findings
The results showed that drought stress in all investigated irrigation methods decreased the silage yield, dry matter yield, and plant height and increased water use efficiency for silage and dry matter production, dry matter percentage, and leaf-to-stem ratio. The highest silage and dry matter yields (79.11 and 17.19 ton ha-1, respectively), and the maximum net benefit per drop (18854 Rials m-3) were obtained by cv. Pegah under full irrigation and drip method, whereas the maximum water use efficiency for silage and dry matter production (34.53 and 7.88 kg m-3, respectively) and the highest benefit per drop (60542 Rials m-3) were recorded in hybrid Speedfeed under severe stress and drip method. The highest leaf-to-stem ratio (0.715) was obtained in the FFI method under severe stress and the amount of this trait in cv. Pegah was about 8.6% higher than that of hybrid Speedfeed. Based on the stress tolerance indices, cv. Pegah under the CFI and drip methods and hybrid Speedfeed under the FFI method had more drought tolerance. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the cultivars under the FFI method.
Conclusion
In order to save water while achieving suitable forage yield and water productivity, the drip irrigation method and supplying 75% of soil moisture deficiency is recommended. If it is impossible to implement the drip irrigation system, the variable alternate furrow irrigation method can produce suitable forage yield while reducing the amount of water consumed.

Keywords

References

Afrasiab, P., Delbari, M. and Jafari, H. 2016. Effect of different levels of irrigation, planting density, planting pattern in drip irrigation on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of corn. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research 47 (4): 731-741. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Afshar, R.K., Jovini, M.A., Chaichi, M.R. and Hashemi, M., 2014. Grain sorghum response to arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphorus fertilizer under deficit irrigation. Agronomy Journal 4: 1212-1218.##Ahmadizadeh, A., Khajoei-Nejad, G. and Abdoshahi, R. 2018. Effect of salicylic acid on morphological characteristics and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivars under different irrigation regimes. Cereal Research 7 (4): 591-603. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Asadi, H., Mahmoodi, M. and Zare, S. 2022. Determining profitability and the economic productivity of agricultural water in crop production. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 15 (6): 1404-1411.##Ashoori, N., Abdi, M., Golzardi, F., Ajali, J. and Ilkaee, M. N. 2021. Forage potential of sorghum-clover intercropping systems in semi-arid conditions. Bragantia 80: e1421.##Baghdadi, A., Paknejad, F., Golzardi, F., Hashemi, M. and Ilkaee, M.N. 2021. Suitability and benefits from intercropped sorghum–amaranth under partial root‐zone irrigation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 101 (14): 5918-5926.##Baghdadi, A. and Golzardi, F. 2022. Forage crops. ETKA Publication, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).##Balazadeh, M., Zamanian, M., Golzardi, F. and Mohammadi Torkashvand, A. 2021. Effects of limited irrigation on forage yield, nutritive value and water use efficiency of Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum) compared to berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 52 (16): 1927-1942.##Bhattarai, B., Singh, S., West, C.P., Ritchie, G.L. and Trostle, C.L. 2020. Effect of deficit irrigation on physiology and forage yield of forage sorghum, pearl millet, and corn. Crop Science 60 (4): 2167-2179.##Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y. and Siddique, K.H. 2016. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36: 3.##Djaman, K. and S. Irmak. 2012. Soil water extraction patterns, crop, irrigation, and evapotranspiration water use efficiency under full and limited irrigation and rainfed conditions. Transactions of the ASABE 55: 1223-1238.##Eskandari, H., Alizadeh-Amraie, A. and Kazemi, K. 2019. Effect of drought stress caused by partial root zone irrigation on water use efficiency and grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) in different intercropping planting patterns. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 12 (1): 29-40. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Falaknaz, M., Aalami, A., Mehrabi, A., Sabouri, A. and Kahrizi, D. 2019. Assessing Aegilops tauschii genotypes to drought stress using tolerance indices. Cereal Research 8 (4): 483-494. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Fallahi, G., Hatami, A. and Naseri, R., 2013. Growth analysis of six corn hybrid under drought conditions in Kermanshah province, Iran. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 7 (2): 181-196. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Farhadi, A., Paknejad, F., Golzardi, F., Ilkaee, M.N. and Aghayari, F. 2022. Effects of limited irrigation and nitrogen rate on the herbage yield, water productivity, and nutritive value of sorghum silage. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 53 (5): 576-589.##Golzardi, F., Baghdadi, A. and Keshavarz Afshar, R. 2017. Alternate furrow irrigation affects yield and water-use efficiency of maize under deficit irrigation. Crop and Pasture Science 68: 726-734.##Jahanzad, E., Jorat, M., Moghadam, H., Sadeghpour, A., Chaichi, M.R. and Dashtaki, M. 2013. Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultural Water Management 117: 62-69.##Kaplan, M., Kara, K., Unlukara, A., Kale, H., Buyukkilic Beyzi, S., Varol, I.S., Kizilsimsek, M. and Kamalak, A. 2019. Water deficit and nitrogen affects yield and feed value of sorghum sudangrass silage. Agricultural Water Management 218: 30-36.##Khalilian, M., Habibi, D., Golzardi, F., Aghayari, F. and Khazaei, A. 2022. Effect of maturity stage on yield, morphological characteristics, and feed value of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cultivars. Cereal Research Communications 50 (4): 1095-1104.##Khazaei, A., Fouman, A., Rahjoo, V. and Golzardi, F. 2019. Sorghum cultivation (Handbook). Agricultural Education Publication, Teharn, Iran. (In Persian).##Khazaei, A., Golzardi, F., Torabi, M., Fyzbakhsh, M., Azari Nasrabad, A., Ghasemi, A., Nazari, L. and Motaghi, M. 2021. Evaluation of the yield stability of grain sorghum genotypes using AMMI analysis in different regions of Iran. Cereal Research 11 (1): 77-88. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Kumar, R., Trivedi, H., Yadav, R., Das, B. and Bist, A.S. 2016. Effect of drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency on brinjal (Solanum melongena) CV Pant-Samra. International Journal of Engineering Sciences Research Technology 5 (10): 7-17.##Li, F., Liang, J., Kang, S. and Zhang, J. 2007. Benefits of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on growth, water and nitrogen use efficiencies modified by fertilization and soil water status in maize. Plant and Soil 295: 279-291.##Majidi Chaharmahali, P., Kashkuli, H., Khodadadi Dehkordi, D., Mokhtaran, A. and Egdernezhad, A. 2022. Impact evaluation of different irrigation regimes on moisture and salinity distribution around the roots of maize plant under drip irrigations. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 15 (1): 199-213. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Mirahki, I., Ardakani, M.R., Golzardi, F., Paknejad, F. and Mahrokh, A. 2022. Biomass production, water use efficiency and nutritional value parameters of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) genotypes as affected by seed hydro-priming and transplanting. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 2 (65): 171-184.##Nematpour, A., Eshghizadeh, H.R., Zahedi, M. and Ghorbani, G.R. 2020. Millet forage yield and silage quality as affected by water and nitrogen application at different sowing dates. Grass and Forage Science 75: 169-180.##Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Moghaddam Vahed, M., Poczai, P. and Siddique, K.H.M. 2019. IPASTIC: An online toolkit to estimate plant abiotic stress indices. Applications in Plant Sciences 7 (7): e11278.##Rafiee, M. 2018. Effect of sowing time on growth and yield of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivars in second cropping in temperate region of Lorestan province. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 3: 180-192. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Sabouri, A. Dadras, A.R., Azari, M., Saberi Kouchesfahani, A., Taslimi, M. and Jalalifar, R. 2022. Screening of rice drought‑tolerant lines by introducing a new composite selection index and competitive with multivariate methods. Scientific Reports 12: 2163.##Shakeri, E., Emam, Y. and Tabatabaei, S. 2017. Evaluation of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) lines and cultivars under salinity stress using tolerance indices. Cereal Research 7 (2): 285-299. (In Persian with English Abstract).##Thiry, A.A., ChavezDulanto, P.N, Reynolds, M.P. and Davies, W.J. 2016. How can we improve crop genotypes to increase stress resilience and productivity in a future climate? A new crop screening method based on productivity and resistance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 67 (19): 5593-5603.##Vasilakoglou, I., Dhima, K., Karagiannidis, N. and Gatsis, T. 2011. Sweet sorghum productivity for biofuels under increased soil salinity and reduced irrigation. Field Crops Research 120: 38-46.##Yang, C., Huang, G., Chai, Q. and Luo, Z. 2011. Water use and yield of wheat/maize intercropping under alternate irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China. Field Crops Research 124: 426-432.##
Cereal Research
Volume 12, Issue 2
September 2022
Pages 115-133

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics