Evaluating Funneliformis mosseae symbiosis with barley cultivars under salinity stress conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

4 Researcher, Institute de Recherche en Biologie Ve´ge´tale, De´partement de Sciences Biologiques, Universite´ de Montre´al, Montre´al, Canada

Abstract

Introduction
Symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi often increases the tolerance of host plants against various stresses. Among abiotic stresses, salinity causes considerable loss in crop productivity. Comprehensive study of plant genotypes response to symbiosis with AM fungi and potential role of this relationship in improving the adverse effects of salinity and increasing plant tolerance would be effective in increasing crop yield. The present study aimed to investigate response of commercial barley varieties to mycorrhizal colonization under salinity stress.
Materials and methods
In this experiment, six commercial barley varieties including Khatam, Golshan, Afzal, Aras, Makoui and Dasht were evaluated at two salinity levels of NaCl (0 and 150 mM) and two symbiosis levels including inoculated and non-inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae. A factorial design in a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted under greenhouse conditions in Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran. Five weeks after cultivation, barley plants were harvested and the traits related to fungal structures including total colonization rate, and the frequency of hyphae, arbuscule and vesicle were measured. Also, some physiological traits including shoot fresh weight, leaf relative water content (RWC), shoot Na+ concentration, shoot K+ concentration, and Na+/K+ ratio were measured.
Research findings
The results of this experiment showed that there was a significant variation between barley varieties in terms of colonization rate and hyphae, arbuscule and vesicle frequencies of AM fungus. Also, salinity stress reduced the colonization rate, and hyphae and arbuscule frequencies of the fungus, but increased the vesicle frequency, which this reduction was more considerable in salt-tolerant varieties, Khatam and Afzal, especially in Afzal. The increase in vesicle frequency was also significant only in Makoui, Aras and Dasht varieties. The results showed that salinity stress reduced shoot fresh weight and leaf relative water content, and increased Na+ concentration and Na+/K+ ratio in all barley varieties, but these changes in Makoui, Aras and Dasht varieties especially in Aras were more than other varieties. On the other hand, colonized plants exhibit lower shoot fresh weight and leaf RWC compared to non-colonized ones. However, symbiosis enhanced leaf RWC in Khatam and Golshan varieties under non-stress conditions.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that there was a significant difference between barley commercial varieties in terms of response to symbiosis with mycorrhizal fungus and response to salinity stress. Although the reduction of colonization rate may help barley plants to prevent the consumption of carbohydrate resources, the expected results of symbiosis in terms of improving barley plant growth or reducing the adverse effects of salinity stress on the plant was not observed in the present study. This indicates the complexity of the symbiotic relationship between plant and fungus, and environmental conditions especially stress conditions can increase this complexity.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmed, I. M., Cao, F., Zhang, M., Chen, X., Zhang, G., & Wu, F. (2013). Difference in yield and physiological features in response to drought and salinity combined stress during anthesis in Tibetan wild and cultivated barleys. PLOS ONE, 8(10), e77869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077869.##Al Mutairi, A. A., Cavagnaro, T. R., Khor, S. F., Neumann, K., Burton, R. A., & Watts-Williams, S. J. (2020). The effect of zinc fertilisation and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on grain quality and yield of contrasting barley cultivars. Functional Plant Biology, 47(2), 122-133. doi: 10.1071/FP19220.##Augé, R. M., Toler, H. D., & Saxton, A. M. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza, 25, 13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0585-4.##Barati, A., Nikkhah, H., Tabatabaee, S., Mahlooji, M., Tajali, H., Karimizadeh, M., Ravari, S., Ghazvini, H., Sorkhi, B., & Koocheki, A. (2021). Golshan, new salt tolerant barley variety suitable for cultivation in the temperate regions of Iran. Research Achievements for Field & Horticulture Crops, 9(2), 153-163. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22092/RAFHC.2021.126236.1195.##Bayani, R., Saateyi, A., & Faghani, E. (2015). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza in phosphorus acquisition efficiency and drought-tolerance mechanisms in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Biosciences, 7(1), 86-94. doi: 10.12692/ijb/7.1.86-94.##Christophersen, H., Smith, F., & Smith, S. (2009). Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization reduces arsenate uptake in barley via downregulation of transporters in the direct epidermal phosphate uptake pathway. New Phytologist, 184(4), 962-974. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03009.x.##Evelin, H., Kapoor, R., & Giri, B. (2009). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Annals of botany, 104(7), 1263-1280. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp251.##Faghani, E., Mirkarimi, A., & Kheradmand, Gh. (2017). Evaluation effect of mycorrhizal inoculums with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) symbiosys in ameliorating salinity stress in Golestan provinve. Research Achivment for Improvement Crop Production, 3(1), 1-25. [In Persian].##Feng, Z., Liu, X., Feng, G., Zhu, H., & Yao, Q. (2020). Linking lipid transfer with reduced arbuscule formation in tomato roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus under low pH stress. Environmental Microbiology, 22(3), 1036-1051. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14810.##Ganugi, P., Masoni, A., Pietramellara, G., & Benedettelli, S. (2019). A review of studies from the last twenty years on plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associations and their uses for wheat crops. Agronomy, 9(12), 840. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120840.##Giovannetti, M., & Mosse, B. (1980). An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytologist, 84, 489-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x.##Goudarzi, M., & Pakniyat, H. (2008). Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences, 4(3), 35-38.##Grace, E., Cotsaftis, O., Tester, M., Smith, F., & Smith, S. (2009). Arbuscular mycorrhizal inhibition of growth in barley cannot be attributed to extent of colonization, fungal phosphorus uptake or effects on expression of plant phosphate transporter genes. New Phytologist, 181, 983-949. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02720.x.##Keshavarz, H., Hosseini, S. J., Sedibe, M. M., & Achilonu, M. C. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi udes to support Iranian barley cultivated on cadmium contaminated soils. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, 20 (1), 43- 53. doi: 10.15666/aeer/2001_043053.##Khalvati, M., Bartha, B., Dupigny, A., & Schröder, P. (2010). Arbuscular mycorrhizal association is beneficial for growth and detoxification of xenobiotics of barley under drought stress. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 10, 54-64. doi: 10.1007/s11368-009-0119-4.##Khosravinejad, F., Heydari, R., & Farboodnia, T. (2009). Growth and inorganic solute accumulation of two barley varieties in salinity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 12(2), 168-172. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2009.168.172.##Masrahi, A. S., Alasmari, A., Shahin, M. G., Qumsani, A. T., Oraby, H. F., & Awad-Allah, M. M. (2023). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate solubilizing bacteria in improving yield, yield components, and nutrients uptake of barley under salinity soil. Agriculture, 13(3), 1-18. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13030537.##Mohammad, M. J., Malkawi, H. I., & Shibli, R. (2003). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus fertilization on growth and nutrient uptake of barley grown on soils with different levels of salts. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26(1), 125-137. doi: 10.1081/PLN-120016500.##Munns, R., & Gilliham, M. (2015). Salinity tolerance of crops–what is the cost? New phytologist, 208(3), 668-67. doi: 10.1111/nph.13519.##Nefissi Ouertani, R., Abid, G., Karmous, C., Ben Chikha, M., Boudaya, O., Mahmoudi, H., Mejri, S., Jansen, R. K., & Ghorbel, A. (2021). Evaluating the contribution of osmotic and oxidative stress components on barley growth under salt stress. AoB Plants, 13(4), plab034. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab034.##Pakniyat, H., Kazempour, A., & Mohammadi, G. (2003). Variation in salt tolerance of cultivated (Horedum vugare L.) and wild (H. spomtaneum C. Koch) barley grnotypes from IRAN. Iran Agricutural Research, 22(1), 45-62. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22099/iar.2003.4267.##Phillips, J., & Hayman, D. (1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55(1), 158-161. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3.##Porcel, R., Aroca, R., Azcon, R., & Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. (2016). Regulation of cation transporter genes by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice plants subjected to salinity suggests improved salt tolerance due to reduced Na+ root-to-shoot distribution. Mycorrhiza, 26, 673-684. doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0704-5.##Sahafi, S. S., Moussavi Nik, S. M., Tabatabaee, S. A., Sabbagh, S. K., & Ghanbari, S. A. (2021). Evaluation of sensitive and tolerant cultivars of barley to salt stress using tolerance indices in central regions of Iran. Journal of Crop Production, 14(1), 103-122. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22069/EJCP.2021.18504.2380.##Salmeron-Santiago, I. A., Martínez-Trujillo, M., Valdez-Alarcón, J. J., Pedraza-Santos, M. E., Santoyo, G., Pozo, M. J., & Chávez-Bárcenas, A. T. (2021). An updated review on the modulation of carbon partitioning and allocation in arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Microorganisms, 10(1), 75. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010075.##Sendek, A., Karakoç, C., Wagg, C., Domínguez-Begines, J., do Couto, G. M., van der Heijden, M. G., Naz, A. A., Lochner, A., Chatzinotas, A., & Klotz, S. (2019). Drought modulates interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and barley genotype diversity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45702-1.##Singh, M., Nara, U., Kumar, A., Choudhary, A., Singh, H., & Thapa, S. (2021). Salinity tolerance mechanisms and their breeding implications. Journal of Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology, 19(1), 173. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00274-4.##Sisaphaithong, T., Kondo, D., Matsunaga, H., Kobae, Y., & Hata, S. (2012). Expression of plant genes for arbuscular mycorrhiza-inducible phosphate transporters and fungal vesicle formation in sorghum, barley, and wheat roots. Bioscience, Biotechnology, & Biochemistry, 76(12), 2364-236. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120782.##Tavakoli, F., Vazan, S., Moradi, F., Shiran, B., & Sorkheh, K. (2010). Differential response of salt-tolerant and susceptible barley genotypes to salinity stress. Journal of Crop Improvement, 24(3), 244-260. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2010.481547.##Vierheilig, H. (2004). Further root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in already mycorrhizal plants is suppressed after a critical level of root colonization. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161(3), 339-341. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-01097.##Watts-Williams, S. J., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain zinc concentration and modify the expression of root ZIP transporter genes in a modern barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar. Plant Science, 274, 163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.015.##Zeeshan, M., Lu, M., Sehar, S., Holford, P., & Wu, F. (2020). Comparison of biochemical, anatomical, morphological, and physiological responses to salinity stress in wheat and barley genotypes deferring in salinity tolerance. Agronomy, 10(1), 127. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010127.